Tuesday, February 24, 2009

ENG101 2nd essay ref.2 annotated bibliography

Affirmative Action- Split Decision Still Wisely Upholds Sound Policy in Michigan Case
The Post Standard
Date of publish – 6/28/03
The Herald Company
TC3
2/24/09
http://docs.newsbank.com/s/InfoWeb/aggdocs/NewsBank/0FCE9BD33893A960/0F9989E5D6CE7776

Argument: legacy admissions for colleges

Claim: Colleges and universities are to continue considering race as a factor in admission policies to advance diversity and address discrimination

Evidence: A student from The University of Michigan wanted the admission system to assign points based on race, but the US Supreme Court denied the request.
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. Seth SicroffFebruary 25, 2009 at 1:56 AM

    -->[WRONG FORMAT]
    -->[How does this relate to legacy admissions?]

    Affirmative Action- Split Decision Still Wisely Upholds Sound Policy in Michigan Case
    The Post Standard
    Date of publish – 6/28/03
    -->publication
    The Herald Company
    TC3
    2/24/09
    http://docs.newsbank.com/s/InfoWeb/aggdocs/NewsBank/0FCE9BD33893A960/0F9989E5D6CE7776

    Argument: legacy admissions for colleges

    Claim: Colleges and universities are to continue
    -->[do you mean "may legally continue"?]
    considering race as a factor in admission policies to advance diversity and address discrimination

    Evidence: A student from The University of Michigan wanted the admission system to assign points based on race, but the US Supreme Court denied the request.

    -->[This does not sound like an argument essay, and it does not seem to be related to legacy admissions.]

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)